Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Freed in 2008

by the Innocence Project

So far this year, 13 people around the United States have been exonerated by DNA testing after serving more than 200 combined years in prison for crimes they didn’t commit. At least 10 more people have been cleared by DNA but are waiting for their exonerations to become official.

Here are the stories of those exonerated so far in 2008:

Michael Blair was convicted and sentenced to death in Texas based on improper forensic testimony and several eyewitness misidentifications. He served nearly 14 years on Texas death row for a murder he didn’t commit.

Kennedy Brewer was sentenced to death in 1995 for a child murder he didn’t commit. He was freed when DNA testing secured by the Innocence Project led to the identity of the real perpetrator. His exoneration also led to critical reforms on handling evidence and state oversight for autopsies.

Dean Cage was exonerated by DNA testing in Chicago after spending 12 years in prison for a rape he didn’t commit.

Charles Chatman served 27 years in Texas prison for a rape he didn’t commit before DNA testing secured by the Innocence Project of Texas set him free.

Nathaniel Hatchett was 17 years old when he was arrested for a carjacking and rape he didn’t commit. He served 10 years in Michigan before he was cleared.

Arthur Johnson spent 16 years in Mississippi prison for a rape he didn’t commit before DNA testing won by the Innocence Project New Orleans led to his release.

Rickey Johnson served 25 years in Louisiana prison for a rape he didn’t commit before the Innocence Project secured DNA testing that proved his innocence. The test results pointed to the identity of a Louisiana inmate who was convicted of committing another rape in the same neighborhood after Johnson was convicted.

Robert McClendon was exonerated by DNA in August in a joint project between the Ohio Innocence Project and the Columbus Dispatch. He spent 17 years in Ohio prison for a crime he didn’t commit before he was cleared.

Thomas McGowan served 23 years in Texas prison for a rape he didn’t commit before DNA testing obtained by the Innocence Project proved his innocence. He was convicted based on a faulty identification procedure.

Steven Phillips was exonerated in October after serving more than two decades in Texas prison for a series of rapes he didn’t commit. DNA testing obtained on Phillips’ behalf by the Innocence Project pointed to the identity of the real perpetrator of the crime.

Ronnie Taylor was convicted in 1993 of a rape he didn’t commit based on faulty forensic tests at the troubled Houston crime lab. His exoneration became official in January, just days after he married his longtime fiancee Jeanette Brown. The couple now lives in Atlanta.

Patrick Waller served more than 15 years in Texas prison for a rape he didn’t commit. He is the 21st person cleared by DNA testing in Dallas County.

Joseph White, exonerated in November, was the first person cleared by DNA testing in Nebraska history. His five co-defendants are awaiting pardons from the governor in order to be fully exonerated.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Give true gift of Christmas: Forgive others

Some time ago, I wrote a column on the barnacles that cover sunken ships to the extent they obscure entirely that which is covered, so as to render unrecognizable the object that is covered.

I wonder if that is happening with the celebration of Christmas. Christmas has really nothing to do with reindeer, Santas, trees, revelry, drinking parties and the like.

Before we can proceed with engaging in the celebration of the season, we will have to "clean out the attic of our minds" (scrape the barnacles, if you please). We have already done a pretty good job of distorting other holidays, such as Easter, which has nothing to do with bunnies and eggs. We also messed up Hallowed Eve (currently Hallow "een") from the purity of remembering the saints who have passed on to the comical nightmare of Halloween.

Christmas introduces into our lives an element of civility, happiness -- purposes greater than those with which we normally deal. It offers a perspective of life that is somehow transcendent, and we begin to think of all things, and others, before ourselves! It changes people, at least for a season, and sometimes for life.

Eleanor Roosevelt once said, "Great minds speak about ideas -- average minds speak about people!" Christmas not only speaks about the greatness of ideas, but also about events and people.

What is Christmas all about? Basically, it is about forgiveness! The one around whom Christmas is centered brought to us the great gift of forgiveness. That forgiveness is all about being what we were created to be. It is about restoration and hope and wholeness.

Just suppose we began each day with not only accepting the gift of forgiveness for ourselves, but also by giving the gift to others -- for the real or imagined hurts, slights and betrayals. How beautiful our relations would be. We would begin each day to live life like the creator intended us to live. What a way to celebrate Christmas! How much more incredibly beautiful it would be.

Try it. It would be the grandest revolution in the world.

A blessed Christmas to you all.

Joseph S. Donchez
Vineland
taken from: TheDailyJournal.com

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Death penalty system fatally flawed

by Sam Millsap, a former Bexar County district attorney

According to a report released last week by the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty — Texas Death Penalty Developments in 2008: The Year in Review — this year Texas juries condemned the fewest number of people to death in more than 30 years.

As of Dec. 10, a total of 10 people (nine men and one woman) had been sentenced to death in Texas in 2008.

Perhaps this reflects the public's growing uneasiness with the death penalty or prosecutors' recognition that the costs of the ultimate punishment — both human and financial — are too high. Or perhaps my fellow Texans have come to share my realization that a fallible system that puts people to death simply cannot be trusted.

Evidence of misplaced trust in the death penalty system was on stark display on Aug. 25, when a Collin County court dismissed all charges against death row inmate Michael Blair for the 1993 rape and murder of 7-year-old Ashley Estell.

After the results of new DNA testing failed to connect him to the crime, those involved in the case agreed that there was not enough evidence to uphold the conviction. Blair had spent 14 years on death row. Michael Blair was the fourth person exonerated from death row nationally in 2008 and the 130th overall since 1973, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

DNA played a role in just 17 of these cases. Blair is the ninth person exonerated from death row in Texas.

Such willingness to admit a mistake has come too late for several inmates who claimed to be innocent of the crimes for which they were executed.

In an interesting turn of events, the Texas Forensic Science Commission agreed this past August to a request from the Innocence Project to investigate the possibility of misconduct in the arson case of Cameron Todd Willingham.

Willingham was convicted in 1991 of setting a fire that killed his three daughters; he was executed by the State of Texas in 2004. According to the Innocence Project, a panel of leading experts later determined that the fire was not arson and that forensic experts at the time of Willingham's trial should have known that the fire was an accident. The commission will investigate the faulty forensic analysis used to convict Willingham.

Similar analysis was used in 2004 to exonerate Ernest Ray Willis, who had spent 17 years on Texas' death row for a crime that did not occur. Should the results of this investigation rule out arson, it will further undermine the credibility and integrity of the Texas death penalty system — though clearly too late to benefit Mr. Willingham.

In another Texas case, that of Carlos De Luna, a documentary film released earlier this year continued to call into question his guilt. “At the Death House Door” is based on an in-depth inquiry by journalists with the Chicago Tribune. To date, no official investigation has taken place, although strong evidence points to another suspect in the crime (now deceased) for which De Luna was executed 19 years ago.

We cannot sanction a death penalty system that gets it right most of the time. An honest assessment of the problems associated with the death penalty is long overdue.

I urge Texas lawmakers to consider the cases of Cameron Todd Willingham, Carlos De Luna, Michael Blair, Ernest Ray Willis and others when they reconvene in January and to recognize the ultimate fallibility of a system that no longer deserves our trust... or our support.

When it comes to human life, a system that gets it right most of the time should not exist at all.
(source: San Antonio Express-Newa)

Friday, December 12, 2008

Death Penalty Should Be Abolished in MD, Commission Recommends

ANNAPOLIS, MD – A commission set up to examine the death penalty in Maryland is recommending that the state abolish it.

Here's the full report:

Today, Chairman Benjamin R. Civiletti and the members of the Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment presented their final report which, after studying the key factors required by statute, recommended that capital punishment in Maryland be abolished.

“I am honored to have served with such dedicated individuals on this Commission and the citizens of Maryland should be proud of their work,” said Chairman Civlietti. “After hearing from many experts and families who have had the misfortune of going through the process of capital punishment, I am confident that we have examined every angle and come to the conclusion that best serves our fellow Marylanders.”

During the 2008 Legislative Session, The Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment was created by an act of the Maryland General Assembly for the purpose of studying all aspects of capital punishment as currently and historically administered in the State. The Commission presented this recommendation in a final report and a minority report in accordance with §2-1246 of the State Government Article, to the General Assembly.

The Commission’s findings from the final report are as follows:

1. Racial disparities exist in Maryland’s capital sentencing system.

2. Jurisdictional disparities exist in Maryland’s capital sentencing system.

3. Due to a lack of research on socio-economic disparities in Maryland, the Commission does not reach a conclusion on this matter.

4. The costs associated with cases in which a death sentence is sought are substantially higher than the costs associated with cases in which a sentence of life without the possibility of parole is sought.

5. While both life without the possibility of parole and death penalty cases are extremely hard on families of victims, the Commission finds that the effects of capital cases are more detrimental to families than are life without the possibility of parole cases. The Commission recommends an increase of the services and resources already provided to families of victims as recommended by the Victims’ Subcommittee.

6. Despite the advance of forensic sciences, particularly DNA testing, the risk of execution of an innocent person is a real possibility.

7. While DNA testing has become a widely accepted method for determining guilt or innocence, it does not eliminate the risk of sentencing innocent persons to death since, in many cases, DNA evidence is not available and, even when it is available, is subject to contamination or error at the scene of the offense or in the laboratory.

8. The Commission finds that there is no persuasive evidence that the death penalty deters homicides in Maryland.

9. Ultimate Recommendation: The Commission recommends abolition of capital punishment in the state of Maryland.


The Commission also presented their minority report to the General Assembly which detailed the opposition to the abolition of the death penalty in Maryland and maintained that the State has in place the tools needed to prevent the unfair application of this practice.

“The close vote on the Commission's findings regarding the death penalty in Maryland demonstrates that this is an issue upon which reasonable minds can differ,” State’s Attorney for Baltimore County Scott Shellenberger said as the representative of the views of the minority vote. “It is my strong belief that the death penalty should remain a sentencing option for those prosecutors who wish to seek it.

The statute passed by the General Assembly called for the Commission to be comprised of 23 appointees – 13 Commissioners were gubernatorial appointees and 9 were non-gubernatorial appointees. Further, the Chair was jointly selected by the Governor, the Speaker of the House and Senate President and as the Statute requires, the Commission represents the broad diversity of views on capital punishment, as well as the racial, ethnic, gender, and geographic diversity of the State.

The Commission held five public hearings where testimony from experts and members of the public was presented. The Commission also held five additional meetings where the testimony and evidence presented to the Commission was discussed and later voted upon. The Commission has made a recommendation concerning the application and administration of capital punishment in the State so that they are free from bias and error and achieve fairness and accuracy.

The final vote count on the recommendation to abolish the death penalty was thirteen members in favor of abolishment and nine members in opposition of that view. Secretary Maynard of the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services abstained from voting. Detailed vote counts on each of the findings of the Commission are contained in the final report.

Members of the public are encouraged to visit the Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment website at http://www.goccp.org/capital-punishment/index.php to view the progress of the Commission. Once the final report is released, DVD’s of the report will be available by request and will also be posted on the Commission website found at the link above.
(Source: Your4state.com)

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Breaking news from Africa:
Death penalty abolished in Togo

The Togolese government has announced the abolition of death penalty, the state radio reported. The decision to scrap death penalty in the West African nation was announced at the end of the cabinet meeting held here Wednesday evening.

"The choice by the country to set up a healthy judiciary limiting miscarriages of justice, correcting, educating and ensuring human rights is no longer consistent with the criminal law that still implements death penalty," a statement read on the state-owned radio said.

An interview with Juan Melendez

SAN JUAN -- Puerto Rican Juan Melendez, who spent 17 years eight months and one day behind bars awaiting execution for a crime he did not commit, told Efe about life on death row at the state prison in Starke, Florida.

Melendez, who entered the prison in 1984 and was released on Jan. 3, 2002, said he survived because of the fraternal love among the inmates, who offer one another "a shoulder to cry on."

But "the worst thing about being inside is when they execute someone who you've been with for so many years and who's become a relative. First, you feel the buzzing when they turn on the electricity in the electric chair and you know the precise moment of execution because the lights go out and flicker."

Also, you miss your family, "especially around Christmas a person needs family warmth more," recalled the 57-year-old Melendez, who upon being convicted broke off his relationship with his girlfriend by whom he had three daughters "so that they would not go through that suffering."

Melendez reunited with his daughters "when they were grown up and didn't know what had happened," and then he got to know his six grandchildren. Now he lives in New Mexico devoting his time and effort to giving talks against the death penalty.[...]

Melendez said that during his stay on death row, he knew at least five other prisoners awaiting execution who were also innocent. "I studied their cases and there was evidence" of their innocence, he said, adding that capital punishment is not the solution to serious crimes because "there are alternatives," such as being sentenced to life in prison.

"When they take away a person's freedom, they're taking away your life. Prison is no party, you don't have to kill him. Besides, the person can change in prison over the years and end up being someone else. However, the death penalty doesn't settle anything," Melendez insisted.

Regarding Puerto Rico, "which received me like a hero," Melendez said he felt proud because the island's people have always been against accepting the death penalty and its constitution prohibits that form of punishment, but the island's status as a U.S. commonwealth subordinates it in the final analysis to U.S. justice.

"The federal government should respect the constitution of Puerto Rico. The people of Puerto Rico don't want the death penalty but the federal government tries to push it on them," he said.

"For me this is really personal. Seeing that there are people who haven't (experienced) what happened to me, but who are fighting against the death penalty makes me feel really proud," Melendez said. EFE

Taken from "Puerto Rican Jailed for 17 Years On Death Row For Murder He Did Not Commit" - Latin American Harold Tribune

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Today marks the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations.

The UDHR was written in a time when the world still recoverd from WW2, in a time when the world still believed this was the last war which would ever happen, when there was hope and a humatarian spirit was to be felt all over the western world.

Today this declaration turns 60. Lots of newspapers write about this anniversary and still: who actually read the declaration? Have YOU ever read it?

A few days ago I sat down thinking about this anniversary and wondering how "modern" the declaration could be? It was written 60 years ago, in a different time, a different atmosphere. Could it be as true and important now as it was back then?

I had read it before, several years ago and every so often I look something up in this declaration but this was the first time I really sat down, read all of it and tried to understand how trying to re-feel the spirit which moved the signers of it to write it. An interesting experience.

So today I don't want to put any long texts on this blog but I want to offer the link to this declaration to you and invite you to read or re-read it and find out what it means for you and how it makes you feel:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights


This is an exact copy of the cover of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which was placed in the Cornerstone of the United Nations Headquarters Building by Trygve Lie, Secretary-General of the United Nations, at the time of the Cornerstone Ceremony which was held at 12 noon, October 24th, 1949, at a special meeting of the Fourth Regular Session of the General Assembly, at the Headquarters site on 42d Street, New York.

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

Author of -Execution’s Doorstep: True Stories of the Innocent and Near Damned- writes about her journey with JOURNEY


Find choice endorsements and recent web exclusives on the book's website (find the link at end of article) Leslie Lytle: "I expected the Journey would be a gut-wrenching and, perhaps, even depressing experience. It was anything but that. Spending eight days with a group of people for whom generosity of spirit had become a way of life, their survival tool for getting through the day, defines the essence of the Journey of Hope..." (Excerpt from article below)

What do they hope for? Find Leslie's answer and links to her book and more by reading this moving piece in full below...
+++++

LOCAL ACTION and beyond...

The Journal of the Cumberland Center for Justice and Peace,
Winter 2008 Volume 13, Number 3

Journey of Hope: From Violence to Healing By Leslie Lytle

Journey press conference at the Montana capitol. The Montana legislature came within one vote of abolishing the death penalty in 2007. The current Death Penalty Study Commission in Tennessee is the first step to introducing abolition legislation in our state.

On October 3, I joined with four vanloads of folks—more than 40 people in all—setting out from Helena, Montana for a whirlwind tour of the state. What did these individuals have in common? For most, tragedy—men and women whose loved ones had been murdered in senseless violent crimes; the niece of a man murdered in legal homicide by the state; two women with family members on death row, struggling to prove their innocence in a court system that refused to give credence to the actual killers’ confessions; and five men who once stood on execution’s doorstep, innocent of the crimes for which they were convicted, and came within days of death.

Soft spoken and gentle in manner, Shujaa Graham would train his eyes on the floor when he talked about how he learned to recognize whether or not he was in for “a beatin’” by differentiating among the bootsteps of the guards tramping down “the row”—death row.

Hands stuffed deep in his pockets, Greg Wilhoit’s “awe shucks” attitude,lent a humorous flavor to his death-row account—“I believed in the death penalty. I was innocent. The other people in there were bad,” Greg jokes. But after a few weeks, he made friends with the man in the cell “next door.” Gregg stuffs his hands deeper in his pockets and looks out over the tops of heads in the crowd gathered to hear him speak, “They killed him—it didn’t accomplish anything.”

The eight-day Montana tour marked the annual Journey of Hope, which originated in 1993 largely through the efforts of Bill Pelke whose diligence and compassion stopped the execution of the teenager who murdered his grandmother. A collaboration between murder victim family members and death row exonerated, the Journey visits a different state each year, making presentations at educational institutions, churches, and civic venues—for the Montana tour sponsoring nearly 50 events.

Many of the Journey members have participated in every Journey tour since 1993. An angelic aura surrounds Marietta Jaeger-Lane whose seven-year-old daughter was kidnapped and murdered during a family camping trip. A year passed before Marietta knew her daughter’s fate. At the peak of her rage,Marietta realized that her hate would destroy her and her family, and she began to pray for her daughter’s abductor, that he would have a good day, catch a “big one” if he went fishing, and that he would be happy and gentle with “Susie.” Eventually, he phoned her. Marietta first asked about her daughter and then asked him, “What can we do for you?” The man broke down and wept.

All of the murder victim family members on the Journey had opposed the execution of the individual who murdered their loved one, yet in many cases, the executions were carried out in spite of their protests. None of them experienced “closure” from this second killing.

Journey members David Kaczynski and Bill Babbitt told parallel stories—both men turned in their brothers to law enforcement officials. “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski killed three people and maimed many more. Viet Nam War veteran Manny Babbitt suffered a psychotic flashback and assaulted an elderly woman who subsequently died of a heart attack. Ted was rich, white, and held a PhD in mathematics. Manny was poor, black, and dropped out of school in the seventh grade. Ted Kaczynski received a sentence of life without parole. Manny Babbitt was executed on his 50th birthday. David and Bill have become like brothers and routinely travel and speak together, telling a story that is larger than them both.

Sujah Graham and Juan Melendez, death-row exonerated, and Delia Meyer-Perez, whose innocent brother is on Texas’ death row, share sympathetic nods as they listen to Bill Babbitt speak.

I was invited to join the Montana Journey of Hope because two of the journey members were featured in my recently released book, -Execution’s Doorstep-, which tells the stories of five men wrongfully sentenced to death. I expected the Journey would be a gut-wrenching and, perhaps, even depressing experience. It was anything but that. Spending eight days with a group of people for whom generosity of spirit had become a way of life, their survival tool for getting through the day, defines the essence of the Journey of Hope.

What do they hope for? They hope that one day the nation will join them in understanding that the death penalty fails the guilty, fails the innocent, fails the victims of violent homicide, and fails each and every citizen of this country who wants to live in a just and compassionate society. I suspect that would be most of us.
+++++

Leslie Lytle is the Executive Director of CCJP. To learn more about her book,
- Execution’s Doorstep: True Stories of the Innocent and Near Damned -
visit Here

Click this link for fuller article with more photos:
Here

Thoughts about the future by Ron Keine

In the last few weeks several people have asked me of my predictions for the abolitionist movement in 2009. I think we should look at the next 8 years to get a true prospective.

Barack Obama has, for the next four years, the task of appointing justices on the Supreme Court. I have no doubt he would appoint liberal judges whom, by nature, would be against capital punishment. The problem is that none of the current justices are ready to die or retire from this life time job. Justice Paul Stevens is the longest serving judge at this time and does not want to retire. Scalia and Thomas (Both Pro Death penalty Vultures) Have no wishes to quit and allow the liberals to amend the constitution. There are predictions that one or two of the conservative judges will retire rather than work with a Democrat president. This is wishful thinking at most. These guys could care less who is president. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg has some health issues but I think she will stick around for 2 or 3 more years. Justice David Souter has been whining about how much he hates his job yet he remains. avid conservative Justices Roberts and Alito will, no doubt, stay awhile.

We must remember that Obama is a lawyer. Although we cannot expect politics to not play a part in his Supreme Court nominations He will pick lawyers of the highest caliber. He already has his sights on Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Kathleen Sullivan. The mere fact that he is considering these women brings to light what I expect to be the big news item for 2009. I believe Obama will scrap Roe Vs Wade. This will make it hard for we abolitionists to get press until this issue is dealt with.

If Obama were to get re-elected and serve another four years, that will take us to the year 2016. That is my estimated time line to end the death penalty in America because the next president will probably be conservative. If we do not end the death penalty in the next 8 years our struggle will be much harder.

By 2012 I expect to see many more states abolish the DP. We should gain New Mexico, Maryland and Montana in 2009 alone. Opinions are changing. More and more people are learning about the death penalty. As Justice Thurgood Marshall said in Furman v. Georgia in 1972.) " if the American people were better informed about the immorality of the death penalty, they would consider it shocking, unjust, and unacceptable". We are getting converts on such a regular basis that we may indeed be sparking a trend in the American public.

For many years I have predicted a snowball effect in the abolitionist movement. We gradually grow and gain momentum thanks to the hard work of all the abolitionist groups, public opinion is changing. This year speakers like Witness to Innocence, Journey of hope, Murder victim family members and a host of other groups, coalitions and projects have reached tens of thousands of people on a personal,in-your-face basis. Our media events have reached millions. We have raised public awareness and the polls show that we are winning the battle.

As this momentum builds I believe it will become a juggernaut which the Pro-death penalty vultures cannot stop. I expect to see it happen in my life time. We must continue our struggle. We must fight for what we know is right knowing that the corrupt prosecutors and the other pro Death Penalty minions are working against us in the shadows. Waiting for their chance to kill somebody.

Ronald Keine

Monday, December 08, 2008

Troy Davis Update

Death Penalty and Execution News

Condemned Ga. man seeks another day in court From December 7, 2008

Troy Davis has already been spared from execution 3 times, and this week his lawyers hope to push his extraordinary case one more step toward his exoneration when they ask a federal panel to let them file another appeal of his death sentence.

As they have argued before, Davis' lawyers will tell the 3-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday that their client was the victim of mistaken identity, and note that 7 of 9 key witnesses that testified against him in the 1991 trial have recanted their statements.

But the hearing likely won't focus entirely on whether Davis was rightly convicted of the 1989 murder of Savannah Police Officer Mark MacPhail. Instead it could turn on whether federal law allows the 40-year-old's attorneys to call for a new trial at all.

Davis' lawyers have struggled to convince a judge at any level to grant him another hearing on claims that he is innocent, partly because much of the evidence they say could lead to his exoneration was revealed after Davis was convicted. The hearing offers them a ripe opportunity to argue that federal laws allow them to pursue such a challenge at this late stage in the process.

In their briefs, Davis' attorneys argue that it is "constitutionally intolerable" to execute Davis without first hearing his innocence claims. They say they could only press the claim that Davis is innocent after they had attempted a range of other appeals.

"It's one of the arguments that can really only be brought after you've exhausted other state avenues of relief," said Jason Ewart, a Davis attorney. "For this claim to be cognizable, you have to show a convincing case of innocence. But one of the issues is whether or not we can bring this case. It's rather nebulous."

Attorneys representing the state say this type of appeal, called a stand-alone innocence claim, could have been made long before Davis' team filed a motion for a new trial in Savannah's Chatham County last year. And they say the courts reviewing the case have already ruled that Davis won't meet high legal standards for a new trial.

The hearing will be the latest flashpoint in a case that has attracted widespread attention, sparked dozens of international protests and won Davis the support of former President Jimmy Carter and leading law-and-order advocates who say Davis deserves another day in court.

"Davis is not asking the court to set him free," former FBI Director William S. Sessions wrote in a recent column. "He is asking for the court's permission to give his innocence claims the full hearing they deserve. Our justice system should punish the guilty, free the innocent and have the wisdom to know the difference."

MacPhail was working off-duty as a security guard at a bus station when he rushed to help a homeless man who had been pistol-whipped at a nearby parking lot. The 27-year-old was shot twice when he approached Davis and 2 other men.

Witnesses identified Davis as the shooter in the 1991 trial, and prosecutors said he wore a "smirk" as he fired the gun. But Davis' lawyers have since argued that new evidence should exonerate their client. And they say three others who did not testify have said another man who testified against Davis at his trial confessed to the killing.

Prosecutors have long argued the case is closed. Savannah District Attorney Spencer Lawton also said he doubts the new testimony meets the legal standards for a new trial, and said the witness recantations invites "a suggestion of manipulation, making it very difficult to believe."

Davis execution was scheduled for July 2007, but it was postponed by Georgia's pardons board less than 24 hours before it was to be carried out. A divided Georgia Supreme Court twice rejected Davis' request for a new trial, and the pardons board turned down another bid for clemency after considering the case again.

As corrections officers prepared for Davis' scheduled Sept. 23 execution, the Supreme Court issued a stay to consider whether to grant him another hearing. A few weeks later, though, the court cleared the way for the execution when it decided against hearing the case.

With legal options dwindling just three days before a 3rd scheduled execution date, Davis' attorneys convinced the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta to stay the execution again. Tuesday's hearing gives them one more chance to press their appeal.

As the case approaches the latest legal hurdle, the Davis and MacPhail families are in limbo.

Davis, who is being held in state prison, longs for another chance to prove he's innocent, said his sister Martina Correia.

"He's gone through a lot in the last year. Having 3 execution dates in a year is more than most people could bear," she said. "But he's staying faithful, and he's praying that the courts could give him some relief, that they will allow a jury to hear the evidence."

For the MacPhails, the hearing is another painful delay for a family seeking closure for 17 years.

"I don't even know what to expect any more. Every time we think, 'This is it,' something else comes up. I don't know what to expect anymore," said Anneliese MacPhail, the slain officer's 75-year-old mother. "My faith is going down rapidly. This should be over by now."

(source: Associated Press)

Sunday, December 07, 2008

SPAIN REFLECTIONS

Dear Friends,

Last year I was invited to Italy by the Community of SantÉgidio (CSE) to participate in the Cities of Life Campaign to abolish the death penalty, and to speak about my experience as a murder victim family member. This year, from November 29-December 6, I was invited to Spain by the CSE to be part of the same campaign and, like Italy, it has truly been a remarkable experience.

I arrived in Barcelona in mid-afternoon on November 29. David Salas and Manel Alonso, members of the CSE, met me at the airport and gave me a warm welcome. In the evening I attended Mass with the CSE at Saint Just church. This was followed by a dinner where I met many members of the CSE, some of whom would be my escorts and translators during the coming week. Each year on November 30, the Rome-based CSE organizes events worldwide to abolish the death penalty. On November 30, 2008, 970 events were held worldwide in over 70 countries and 52 capitals, calling for an end to the death penalty. At the Cities of Life event held in the historic square in Barcelona, I was honored to be one of the speakers. Other speakers included Jaume Castro, the founder of the CSE in Barcelona, a representative of the mayor, a local news journalist and a respresentative of Amnesty International. Some 300 people attended this outdoor event, which also included a time of remembrance for the executed--1252 people were executed worldwide in 2007--as well as music by a popular jazz band.

Following this program I flew to Madrid for I was asked to speak there the next morning. I spoke to about 50 students who were part of an English class at the Universidad Complutense. After the class CSE member Jesús Romero gave me a tour of special historic sites of Madrid. Jesús and I then had a good visit with Sr. Leonora, a Carmelite sister who knows the Carmelites in Washington, D.C. whom I am good friends with. I then flew back to Barcelona to continue my speaking tour.

During the next three days I spoke to over 700 students and teachers at two universities and five high schools. There were many powerful moments of sharing with the students, including meeting some who experienced the murder of a loved one. On December 3, before speaking at the Escola Joviat in Manresa, which is about one hour from Barcelona, David took me to visit the cave where St. Ignatius of Loyola wrote the famous spiritual exericses. During my time at the cave, which has been converted into a small chapel, I gave thanks to God for the life of St. Ignatius and remembered in a special way all those Jesuits who have helped and inspired me in my faith journey. Before leaving Manresa, I did an interview with the local newspaper.

Following my return to Barcelona, I learned that Peg McCarthy, my wife Colleen´s beloved aunt, went home to God late in the evening on December 2, the anniversary of the martyrdom of the four U.S. churchwoman who were killed in El Salvador in 1980. Aunt Peg was a holy disciple of Jesus and a reservoir of love for her family and for so many others. I give thanks to God for her great life, and that I had the honor of knowing her. My heart and prayers go out to her beautiful family during this most difficult time. I take consolation in knowing that she is now home with God and is interceding for us along with the entire cloud of witnesses.

My final day in Barcelona included doing an interview with Catholic TV program to be aired on Public Television, visiting Barcelona´s beautiful port, and saying goodbye to members of the CSE.

As I prepare to leave Barcelona tomorrow, I am deeply grateful to the CSE for the countless grace-filled experiences I´ve had during my time in Spain, and for taking such good care of me. My Barcelona hosts, Manel and his wife, Meritxell Téllez, have provided me with extraordinary hospitality. CSE members David Salas, Mariona Téllez, Jordi Vidal and others who have escorted me to different events have been incredible. Evening prayer with the CSE has been very enriching, and I will always be thankful to the community for their prayers for Aunt Pag and her extended family upon learing of her death. Lastly, being able to accompany CSE members in their Thursday evening food sharing with homeless friends living on the streets was a very life-giving experience.

During this Advent time, let us pray for one another that we can deepen our commitment to stand for life wherever it is threatened. In some small way, let us seek to make the Word flesh, as we strive to be Jesus´peace and justice makers in our violent yet still beautiful world.

With love and gratitude,
Art

Art Laffin is a Journey of Hope member who participated in the Cities for Life campaign for Sant Egidio. Art was sent to Spain and the following is his reflection. Last year Art joined the campaign with us in Rome.

Friday, December 05, 2008

SC slaying victim's dad says execution won't help

The father of a woman slain 16 years ago in what authorities initially said was retribution by 5 black men for centuries of racial oppression won't make the trip to South Carolina to see his daughter's killer put to death Friday.

"I'm not going to view the execution because it will just open old wounds," said Clair McLauchlin, 76, who lives with his wife Patricia in Live Oak, a small town in northern Florida.

McLauchlin said the death by lethal injection of Joseph Gardner, 38, on Friday also won't bring closure for his family, even after all these years.

"I can tell you right now, it will never be closed," said McLauchlin, who expects to get a phone call from prison officials when the execution is carried out.

"He was sentenced to death, but he sentenced us to a life sentence when he killed her," McLauchlin said. "It's never going to change. It's never going to go away."

The brutal kidnapping, rape and slaying of 25-year-old Melissa "Missi" McLauchlin, who was white, brought worries about racial unrest just months after the 1992 Los Angeles riots stemming from the acquittals of white police officers accused of beating black motorist Rodney King.

At the time of the shooting, police said Gardner and his co-defendants decided to kill a white woman as retribution for the mistreatment of blacks during slavery. They said a letter found during the investigation contained racial slurs and statements justifying revenge against whites.

But at the trial, there was little mention of race. The victim's family and Gardner's attorneys don't think the killing really had anything to do with racial revenge.

"We have found over the years people will use the most convenient excuse that they can find for their actions if they get caught," McLauchlin said. "In this case, the excuse was 400 years of persecution."

Tim Kulp, the court-appointed defense attorney for Gardner, agrees.

"I don't think there was any specific intention of trolling for a white girl," said Kulp. "I think they were just out doing drugs, cruising around and she was at the worst place at the worst time."

Gardner, a Detroit native, was 1 of 5 men convicted in the McLauchlin case and the only one sentenced to death. He went AWOL from his Charleston-based Navy ship and was on the FBI's Most Wanted List before his arrest in Philadelphia almost 2 years later.

Prosecutors said several defendants saw Missi McLauchlin, who was living in North Charleston, walking along a road near her home on Dec. 30, 1992. The men offered her drugs in exchange for sex and 5 men later raped her at gunpoint at a mobile home, authorities said. They then made her bathe, bound and blindfolded her and forced onto the floor of a car.

Gardner shot McLauchlin twice when she managed to free herself from the handcuffs and then 3 more times by the side of a road near Summerville where her body was left, authorities said. After the slaying, the McLauchlins, who then lived in Michigan, went to the media urging calm in both Detroit and in South Carolina amid reports the slaying was racially motivated.

"There were 2 things then," McLauchlin recalled, "We definitely felt that way and we didn't want anybody hurt and 2, if the law enforcement people are running around trying to quell riots ... they are not going to be looking for the guy who shot her."

During Gardner's trial, co-defendant Matthew Carl Mack, sentenced to life for his part in the crime, said the defendants spent the hours before the slaying watching pornographic movies as well as movies showing real executions and deaths.

They also watched a recap of the Rodney King beating story, he said.

Mack testified Gardner commented at the time, "That's 400 years of oppression. That's why that could happen." He also testified Gardner said he would kill a police officer if he had been the one who had been beaten.

Another defendant got a life sentence; 2 others who raped the victim received less than 10 years in prison as a result of plea deals.

Gardner will be the 40th person executed in South Carolina since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, and the 3rd inmate put to death in the state this year.

(source: Associated Press)

South Carolina: Lawyer says: Race played no role in murder

The Nov. 18 article, "Execution date set in racial killing," perpetuates a myth that began before Joseph Gardner was ever tried for the murder of Melissa McLaughlin, and has compromised the search for truth ever since. The senseless and undeniably tragic homicide of Ms. McLaughlin was not a "racial killing" when it occurred. It was a terrible and unnecessary end to an evening of impulsive and deplorable conduct by a number of people, including Mr. Gardner, but it had nothing to do with race.

The case started to become a "racial killing" when a co-defendant signed a highly embellished statement to that effect, written by his interrogators in Michigan, after many hours of pressure to do so. It progressed toward a "racial killing" when prosecutors sought to bolster their chance for a conviction and death sentence by feeding reporters characterizations of the co-defendant's statement designed to exploit racial divisions in the community. And it fully matured into a "racial killing" when reporters embraced what they had been fed and turned it into a sensation through literally hundreds of stories in newspapers and on television.

Those same characterizations reappeared in the Nov. 18 article, which referenced "what prosecutors described as (Mr. Gardner’s) revenge for centuries of oppression against blacks," and prosecutors' citation of "a letter found by investigators that contained racial slurs and passages aimed at justifying revenge against whites."

But when the case went to trial — that is, when the prosecution was required to present real proof of its claims — evidence of a "racial killing" was conspicuously absent. Perhaps prosecutors refrained because they knew the claims were untrue. Or perhaps they had already gotten what they needed through the media coverage, with which 10 of the 12 jurors who decided Mr. Gardner's fate admitted their familiarity. Whatever the explanation, the indisputable fact is that the prosecution did not prove — indeed, did not even attempt to prove — that the homicide was a "racial killing."

Had the claims of a "racial killing" ended there, this newspaper might never have had occasion to announce the setting of Friday as Mr. Gardner's execution date. Unfortunately, we will never know. In a move so devoid of strategic benefit that even the notoriously conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit called it "constitutionally deficient," Mr. Gardner's own trial lawyer provided the jury with the statement written by the Michigan interrogators and signed by the co-defendant. As a result, the prosecution got the benefit of its pre-trial media theme without ever even having to prove it, and the jury got to pass judgment on the "racial killing" they had read about and seen on TV.

In the years that followed, the hollowness of the "racial killing" story was revealed. The co-defendant whose signature had started it all testified under oath and without contradiction that the claims of racial hatred in the statement he signed were not true, and that he would have said so at Mr. Gardner's trial if anyone had bothered to ask. Other aspects upon which the prosecution had relied to make the case appear more aggravated than it was were deconstructed and disproved. And the mishandling of Mr. Gardner's defense was revealed so starkly that even the federal court of appeals acknowledged it. By the time these facts came to light, however, the producers and consumers of the "racial killing" story had long since stopped paying attention.

Now that Mr. Gardner’s pending execution has revived the newsworthiness of his case, it is disappointing — but hardly surprising — to see the "racial killing" headline dusted off and printed once again. In some ways, perhaps it no longer matters; headline or no headline, Mr. Gardner's legal challenges to that part of the case are finished. But in other, more enduring ways it matters a great deal, because it implies that the story propagated through sound bites and repetition more than a decade ago was valid then and remains valid today.

As anyone willing to examine the more than 10,000 pages of testimony and documents would surely discover, it wasn't, and it doesn't. The purveyors of the story may not have known any better when they originally inflamed the community's fears and biases, and in the process diminished Mr. Gardner's chance at a fair trial and sentence. But they should know better now. This time around, the appeal to fear and bias diminishes the rest of us.

Some will say that Mr. Gardner will get what he deserves Friday. That is debatable. What is not debatable is that the “racial killing” myth that has for so long distorted perceptions of his case by capitalizing on racial division deserves, at long last, to be put to rest.

Mr. Weyble, who directs death penalty litigation at the Cornell Law School Death Penalty Project, is Mr. Gardner's appellate attorney.

(source: Opinion, Keir Weyble; The State)

State killing in the name of SC's citizens scheduled for today - please call or FAX SC Governor's office today

Cruel and Unusual: "We Don't Want Any Other Mothers To Go Through This"

Cruel and Unusual: Serving a Death Sentence in a Prison Hospital
By Liliana Segura

Montell Johnson is a 42-year-old man who spends every hour of every day in a hospital bed. He can't move, and he can't talk. He eats through a feeding tube inserted into his stomach. Years of inactivity have taken their toll: "He has no body tissue or muscle now," his mother, Gloria, says. "He's very sensitive to touch, and so it's excruciating pain when you touch his body … There's nothing really there to protect him." He weighs 70 lbs.

Johnson suffers from multiple sclerosis, a chronic and debilitating illness that attacks the central nervous system and erodes a person's capacity for basic functions. He is in the final stages of MS and is suffering from a long list of related and other ailments, including hepatitis C, which threatens to take his life. Just over a year ago, a doctor gave Johnson less than six months to live. That he has defied the prognosis is undoubtedly due to the dedicated care of his mother, rather than the quality of his medical care, because Johnson is not at a hospital. He is a prisoner at Sheridan Correctional Center, in La Salle County, Ill.

Five days a week, Gloria Johnson-Ester drives from her home on the South Side of Chicago to Sheridan, two hours away ("two-and-a-half to three in traffic"). Since her son was diagnosed with MS in 2001, she has seen his health deteriorate dramatically due to gross medical neglect by the Illinois prison system.

"Inmates aren't considered a priority," she says, "but I always tell people, they are human beings. … Whether they are guilty or innocent, when they get sick, you treat them."

Johnson was convicted of murder in 1999 and sent to death row. In 2003, his sentence was commuted to 40 years, and on Oct. 30, 2008, Gov. Rod Blagojevich commuted his sentence to time served. This means the state of Illinois has no legal basis for keeping him incarcerated. But now he faces a new challenge: the possibility of extradition to California for different charge. For Gloria, who has been fighting for years to bring her son home for the last months of his life, this would be an unthinkable defeat.

"I know one thing," she says. "If they take me away, then he'll just give up."

"An Easy Conviction"...(see link to full article below)

J..."Montell Was Not Cared For Properly"

Johnson-Ester's first run-in with the health care provided by Illinois' Department of Corrections was in 1999, when her son was awaiting trial in a Macon County jail. She had attended a wedding reception in Grand Rapids, Mich., when she received word from her mother that Jordan had fallen and been knocked unconscious. She drove to the Decatur, Ill., jail, only to be barred from visiting him. By the time she saw him, it was Tuesday. "I asked Montell what they gave him. He said, 'Tylenol.' "

In January 2001, Johnson was diagnosed with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. By then, he was at Menard Correctional Center, a maximum-security prison that Johnson-Ester describes as "a death trap." As the illness took effect, he was transferred to different facilities, none of which were equipped to deal with his deteriorating health. Between 2001 and 2005, he was not seen by a neurologist.

By 2005, he could not stand, walk, bathe or dress himself. Despite this, he remained in the condemned unit at Menard, designated a "high escape risk." Eventually, he was transferred to Pontiac Correctional Center, where, in February 2006, he was diagnosed with dementia.

Finally, in April 2006, Johnson was transferred to Dixon Correctional Facility, supposedly, the best medical facility in the Illinois prison system.

"I'd been begging to put him there," Johnson-Ester recalled. "But that was his death sentence."

It was at Dixon that Johnson developed severe bedsores, which Gloria discovered in 2006. He had been complaining about being in pain. "When I rolled him over," recalls Gloria, "I saw the wounds."

Bed sores are preventable but serious injuries that can be life threatening if left untreated. According to the Mayo Clinic, "Bedsores, more accurately called pressure sores or pressure ulcers, are areas of damaged skin and tissue that develop when sustained pressure -- usually from a bed or wheelchair -- cuts off circulation to vulnerable parts of your body." For someone who is bedridden, bedsores can form anywhere, from one's lower back to the rims of one's ears. The key to avoiding them is to move a patient continually throughout the course of the day. Nutrition is also important. But Johnson was getting neither. The result was Stage Four bed sores, the most serious and advanced stage, "in which a large-scale loss of skin occurs, along with damage to muscle, bone and even supporting structures such as tendons and joints."

"Montell was not cared for properly by the Department of Corrections," says Pearson, the activist. "Really, they just couldn't take care of him. They were not equipped."

After Johnson-Ester saw the bedsores, she became much more vigilant about her son's care. In August 2007, she started a blog documenting her visits with him, detailing his condition, the state of his care and her many frustrating interactions with the prison warden and medical staff, who eventually discovered the blog and tried to get it taken down.

Johnson-Ester's early posts described the strange visiting area allocated to her and her son at Dixon, a "laundry room with a washing machine, dryer and dirty and clean linen."

8/29/07 -- Today I visited Montell. When I arrived at the infirmary Montell, was in the gerry chair, and he looked very uncomfortable. He tried to change his position from left to right. He was nonverbal and tears were streaming down his face. The washing machine and dyer was running and quite noisy, and this seemed to be irritating him. I asked him if anybody had done anything to him and he shook his head as to be saying "No." I asked him if he had received all his meals, he shook his head from side to side.

Subsequent entries chronicled the many times she was denied visiting privileges for seemingly arbitrary reasons, as well as Johnson's transfer, in the fall of 2007, from the correctional unit to a medical unit, where he nearly died. A post from Nov. 6, 2007 describes the day his feeding tube was put in. The next day, she wrote:

The rumor I heard yesterday became a reality today. Yes, Montell was going to be taken back to Dixon Correctional Center sometime today. I talked with Dr. Amissi Patel, and she stated that Montell was too weak to have any more surgeries and that they were releasing him. I told her that with the feeding tube in him they were just setting him up to die. He wouldn't have been in this condition in the first place if they had taken care of him. I spent most of the day trying to contact people to have them stop this move back to Dixon. Montell just laid in my arms and held my hand … I stayed until the ambulance people came to get him and helped dress him for the trip back to Dixon. I left before they did because I couldn't take seeing them take him back there, and I didn't want him to see the tears streaming down my face. Lord please help us.

The last post on the blog, dated Dec. 19, 2007, begins: "My visiting privileges revoked today because of my concern and expressions of Montell's health care."

"The Last Thing California Needs is Another Sick Prisoner"

Anyone familiar with California's prison system knows that it is the last state that should be taking on the care of another sick prisoner. The state has been besieged for years by reports that its bloated prison system -- which houses 170,000 people in facilities built for 100,000 -- is overwhelmed by the number of prisoners in need of health care, many of them elderly. In fact, California's prison medical facilities are currently under receivership, which Johnson's attorney Harold Hirshman explains, "means literally that a federal judge has appointed a person outside the prison system to run the delivery of medical care." The current receiver, J. Clark Kelso, has described California's medical facilities as being "in an abysmal state of disrepair." (The cost of repair, as reported this spring by the Los Angeles Times, "nearly triples the $2.5 billion the governor proposed for new medical facilities in his budget submitted to lawmakers in January.")

"The last thing California needs, given that it's under receivership for failing to provide constitutional minimum health care, is another sick prisoner to take care of," says Hirshman. Yet, he says, "logic doesn't seem to have much to do with any of these decisions. I believe that it is simply that he's a murderer in California, so they want to take him back."

"We Don't Want Any Other Mothers To Go Through This"...(condensed)

Hoyt, who first met Johnson-Ester at Johnson's trial, has felt a kinship with her from the start. "I couldn't help that, because any mother in that position -- she didn't do anything. Even if he had done it, there was something that just told me. … I just felt so bad for her."

Johnson-Ester approached Hoyt in the courtroom. "She said, 'I'm really sorry if my son did this. I don't think he is capable of this.' " The two got to know each other little by little. Today, says Johnson-Ester "she's like a sister to me."

"It's not just about Montell and Dorianne anymore," says Hoyt, "It's, 'oh my God, we don't want any other mothers to go through this.' "

© 2008 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.

Find full article in archive

Here

Thursday, December 04, 2008

TCADP Annual Report

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, December 4, 2008

CONTACT: Kristin Houle, Executive Director

512-441-1808 (office); 202-494-3578 (cell), khoule@tcadp.org

Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty Releases Report on
Death Penalty Developments in 2008

"Average" Number of Executions Carried Out in Record Time as New Death Sentences Reach Lowest Level in Texas in 30 Years

(Austin, Texas) - Today the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP) released its annual report on death penalty developments statewide, in advance of the December 7 anniversary of the resumption of executions in Texas in 1982. According to the report, Texas juries newly condemned nine individuals (eight men and one woman) to death in 2008, the lowest number of new death sentences since official reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976. Juries also resentenced two people to death.

A de facto moratorium on executions nationwide existed from September 26, 2007 until April 16, 2008 while the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the lethal injection protocol used by the majority of death penalty states. On April 16, the Court ruled in Baze v. Rees that the current protocol used by Kentucky (and other states, including Texas) does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The decision lifted all stays in effect at the time and paved the way for the resumption of executions. Texas' first execution of the year took place on June 11, 2008, when Karl Chamberlain was put to death. The State went on to execute 17 more people in the latter half of 2008, accounting for 50% of all executions in the United States this year. Seven of those executed had been convicted in Dallas County.

"2008 can only be characterized as yet another rollercoaster year for the death penalty in Texas," said TCADP Executive Director Kristin Houle. "The state carried out a 'typical' number of executions in a record amount of time - averaging nearly one per week over a five-month period. Yet officials' zeal for executions was not matched by public desire for new death sentences, as evidenced by the continued steep decline in the number of new inmates arriving on death row."

This past year also was notable for the executions that did not occur. Six inmates with execution dates in 2008 received last-minute stays, due to concerns about possible innocence, the fairness of their trial, or issues related to mental retardation or mental illness. The case of Charles Hood, in particular, challenged the integrity of the Texas judicial system, after solid evidence confirmed that the judge who presided over his original trial was romantically linked to the prosecutor who sought his death sentence. Hood received a stay from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on September 9 on an issue unrelated to the improper relationship; his attorneys continue to seek a new trial.

Other highlights of TCADP's report, Texas Death Penalty Developments in 2008, include the following:
* In 2008, the State of Texas carried out 18 executions in 5 months. Only eight other states carried out executions this year; none executed more than four people. Texas has executed 423 people since 1982. Currently there are 354 inmates on death row in Texas - 344 men and 10 women.
* Michael Blair became the 9th inmate exonerated from death row in Texas after DNA testing failed to connect him to the crime for which he was convicted and sentenced to death.
* Seven other inmates were removed permanently from death row in 2008; their sentences were commuted to life in prison. This includes Thomas Miller-El, Johnny Paul Penry, and LaRoyce Smith, whose convictions and/or death sentences had been overturned at various junctures by the U.S. Supreme Court.
* Jurors rejected the death penalty in at least four capital murder trials in 2008, opting instead for the punishment of life in prison without the possibility of parole.
* Harris County, which accounts for more executions than any state in the country (besides Texas), did not send a single person to death row in 2008.
* Texas defied federal officials and the International Court of Justice when it executed Mexican national Jose Medellin on August 5, 2008, despite the fact that he had been denied the right to contact his consular office upon his arrest in 1993 as afforded by the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.
* The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kennedy v. Louisiana on June 25, 2008 invalidated the death penalty provision of "Jessica's Law," which the Texas Legislature passed in 2007. The Justices ruled 5-4 that the death penalty is unconstitutional as a punishment for the crime of raping a child and they effectively barred its imposition for any crime that does not take the life of the victim.

Texas already has scheduled 11 executions for the first 3 months of 2009. "Despite continued concerns about the flaws and failures of the Texas death penalty system - and growing public awareness of its fallibility - the 'conveyor belt to death' continues to operate on high gear," said Houle. "TCADP urges all elected officials to take a hard look at this costly, broken government system - a system that produces wrongful convictions and most likely wrongful executions - and to support alternatives that protect society and punish the truly guilty."

TCADP is a statewide, grassroots organization based in Austin, Texas.

Contact Kristin Houle at khoule@tcadp.org to receive a copy (of the full report) directly via email.

Please help us track media coverage of the report in your area! Send any articles, news briefs, etc. that appear in your local newspaper (either in print or online) to khoule@tcadp.org. Letters to the editor based on the information in the report and online comments in response to articles are also encouraged. Contact Kristin if you have any questions or would like to receive talking points. Thank you!

TCADP 2009 Annual Conference

Raising our Voices for Abolition, Saturday, February 21, Austin, TX

Keynote Speaker: Celeste Fitzgerald of New Jerseyans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty

Mark on your calendar and plan to attend. Support the work of your local chapter and the state organization of TCADP by attending the annual conference and learning more about ending the death penalty in Texas...

Become a member of the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and support the education and advocacy work we are doing to end the death penalty in Texas. Your support is vital. Join!

Your membership supports our many educational opportunities working to end the death penalty in Texas: the mental illness and the death penalty campaign, religious outreach, "At the Death House Door" film screenings, and more. You also receive a quarterly newsletter that keeps you up to date on what is happening on the death penalty in Texas. We appreciate your generosity!
----------------------------------------------------------
For more information on TCADP's activities consult the TCADP website at
Here or call us in Austin at 512 441-1808!

Our postal address is
2709 S Lamar
Suite 109
Austin, Texas 78704
United States

A Few Photos From Rome


Bill Pelke and members of the Community Sant'Egidioat a vigil in front of the Roman Coliseum


Renny Cushing, director of MVFHR and Mario Marazziti of the Sant Egidio Community prior to a group of the members of the JOH accompanying Mario to City Hall to meet the Mayor and record his statement for the Cities for Life event the following day


Bill with Billy Moore, post-Colosseum event


Bill with Celeste Fitzgerald (who coordinated the successful NJ campaign) enjoying a little time off

Montana: Fantastic Report from Jennifer Kirby, Coordinator, Montana Abolition Coalition

This note came to the participants of The Journey of Hope who were recently in Montana ... Bill says, share it...
********
Just wanted to share something with you…

We recently had a woman contact us and ask how she could be involved. Turns out that she’s the head of a major religious organization that includes a number of our key target districts. She told us that she wasn’t ever sure how she felt about the death penalty. Then she attended a Journey of Hope event and that it not only changed her mind but moved her so incredibly that she’s wanting to know how to help. The Journey of Hope didn’t just get us one volunteer though – because she presented this to her religious group and they voted to be involved. We are putting together an “action day” – where they write letters to legislators and newspapers and basically take action on this issue. So we now have gained an Action Group in target districts and we are building numbers every day. This is directly due to the work that you did in Big Sky country.

Please note this is only one example of how your work made a difference in Montana. You have helped us enormously beyond that – we are busy building such a great network off of the Journey… the momentum is just amazing. The Journey is helping us really build our contact base… because it seems that everyone that signed up helps lead us to a new group of people or a great contact or even a legislator themselves… so its very positive outcome and we couldn’t be more pleased.

On a legislative note. Elections are over and we are looking at a Republican controlled Senate and a split House of Representatives (50/50). However, we are optimistic in this. We are very happy with the legislative assignments. We are blessed in the republican controlled Senate to have such great bi-partisan support. AND the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of Judiciary Committee are both Republican allies. The House Chairman is not with us (yet!) – but a majority of the House Judiciary Committee is in favor of Abolition. We have a lot of work still to do – but we head into the legislature with high hopes and a strong grassroots base (which the Journey has helped to nearly triple at this point). We remain extremely confident that we can accomplish our goal.

Just wanted to say thanks again and keep up the tremendous work!

Jen

Jennifer Kirby
Coordinator, Montana Abolition Coalition
406-461-8176
jenk@aclumontana.org
jenk@mtabolitionco.org


Photo by Jack Payden-Travers, ACLU Capital Punishment Project

Legislature 2009: Political shift could spell end to death penalty

Abolishing the death penalty is one of those "perennial" bills that pops up in the state Legislature every 60-day session, getting much discussion, raising emotions and eventually dying in some committee.

But with recent political changes in New Mexico, some think a death-penalty repeal stands a better chance of passing this year than in previous sessions.

Viki Elkey, coordinator of the New Mexico Coalition to Repeal the Death Penalty, said last week that she is more optimistic about the chances for a repeal bill this year because of two major political developments — Democratic victories in legislative races, including three state Senate seats, and the likelihood that Diane Denish and not Bill Richardson will be governor.

Richardson, who ran for president last year, was firmly opposed to abolishing the death penalty. The issue is a political hot potato and wedge issue frequently used by Republicans and other conservatives to label their opponents "soft on crime."

In 2005, when the Legislature was considering a repeal bill, national pundit Larry Sabato said Richardson couldn't afford to back such a measure. That bill is deadly to his campaign if he becomes a candidate for president," said Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. "It's a no-win proposition for him. He needs to make certain that bill never makes it to his desk."

It didn't. The bill died in the Senate Judiciary Committee when a Democratic senator who previously had supported the bill changed his vote. The same bill met a similar fate in the 2007 session.

But Elkey said Denish — who will become governor if Richardson, as expected, gets appointed as secretary of commerce — is far more sympathetic to a repeal.

A spokeswoman for Denish, asked Tuesday about the lieutenant governor's position on the death penalty, declined comment.

Elkey said Rep. Gail Chasey, D-Albuquerque, once again will carry the legislation. Chasey has sponsored death-penalty bills in the past several 60-day sessions.

Another political change that might affect a death-penalty bill is the fact that there probably will be at least one less district attorney lobbying against it this time. In past sessions, Santa Fe District Attorney Henry Valdez has been on hand to lobby in favor of keeping capital punishment as an option.

But in January, Valdez will no longer be in office and his replacement, Angela "Spence" Pacheco, might not be taking up the cause to keep capital punishment. Pacheco couldn't be reached for comment, but in a May interview, she told The New Mexican she wasn't certain about whether she'd seek the death penalty in cases she prosecutes. "There has been so much in the news lately about innocent people being sent to death," she said. "It's the final punishment, and we have to be so careful we don't kill an innocent person. I would have to look at it very hard before I'd charge it."

In 1991, Pacheco was part of the prosecution team in the death penalty case against Ricky Abeyta in what was called "The Chimayó Massacre." Abeyta was convicted of seven homicides and sentenced to more than 120 years in prison. But the jury decided against imposing capital punishment.

As in previous years, the new bill would establish a penalty of "life in prison without the possibility of parole." Under current law, those who receive life sentences are eligible for parole after 30 years of incarceration.

Also, as in previous attempts to pass the bill, Elkey said most of the people testifying in committees for the bill will be people whose family members have been murdered.

The Coalition to Repeal the Death Penalty is an umbrella group that represents dozens of churches, religious organizations, legal and medical associations, and social-activist groups.

New Mexico is one of 36 states with a capital punishment law. The number slowly is going down. Last year, New Jersey became the latest to repeal its death-penalty law, replacing the sentence of execution with life without parole.

Two people are on death row in New Mexico. Timothy Allen of Bloomfield was convicted in 1995 of first-degree murder, rape and kidnapping. Robert Fry of Farmington was convicted in 2002 of two counts of first-degree murder; two counts of kidnapping; one count of rape; two counts of tampering with evidence; and a count of attempted robbery with a deadly weapon.

In Santa Fe, prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against John La Bombard, 35, and Justin Romero, 26. Both are charged with murdering Frank Segura in the Santa Fe National Forest in July.

Nine convicted murderers in New Mexico have died in the electric chair, the gas chamber and by lethal injection since the state Corrections Department began conducting executions in 1933. Before that year, executions were handled by individual county sheriffs in New Mexico.

The most recent execution was that of Terry Clark, a confessed child killer and rapist from Artesia. He was lethally injected in November 2001, becoming New Mexico's first legal execution in 41 years.

In New Mexico, serious questions have arisen about at least two men executed by the state — Louis Young in 1947 and Thomas Johnson in 1933. Both were black men convicted of murdering white women in Santa Fe. The Johnson case was the subject of a 2002 book by Ralph Melnick called Justice Betrayed: A Double Killing in Old Santa Fe.

In the past, abolition advocates have brought people who have been wrongly put on death row to the Legislature to talk with lawmakers. One who came in 2005 was Ron Keine, a former member of the Vagos motorcycle gang who was sentenced to death for an Albuquerque murder in the 1970s only to be exonerated a few years later when the true killer confessed. Keine, years after his release, became an official in his local Republican Party in Michigan.

Juan Melendez, who spent nearly 18 years on death row in a Florida prison until he was exonerated, has come to the state at least twice to lobby against the death penalty. Melendez now lives in the state and is involved in a theatrical presentation dealing with the death penalty.

(Steve Terrell | The New Mexican)

A message from Ron Keine

Some times an old adage really rings true. Like the one that says that if you look hard enough, you can find something you like about any human being. In the case of New Mexico's Governor Bill Richardson, that one thing is his much celebrated and anticipated absence.

President-elect Barack Obama named New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson as commerce secretary on Wednesday.

As Governor Richardson packs his saddlebags for Washington, Abolitionists all over New Mexico are saying "Good riddance". Now that the beautiful state is disencumbered of one of the worst pro death penalty proponents the state has even known, abolition looks almost eminent. Bill Richardson, almost single handedly, circumvented every effort by the New Mexico Coalition to Repeal the Death Penalty and other fine abolitionists. It could very well be the Next state to abolish the death penalty.

Note: Jenifer Kirby of the Montana Coalition believes that Montana is so close that it may be the next to abolish. Let us not forget also that Maryland may well surprise all of us.

Stepping up to the plate as Governor Of New Mexico is Lieutenant Governor Diane D. Denish who is against the death penalty. Maybe now we have someone who will do the right thing.

Ron Keine

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

A former police officer and military police officer speaks out

I spent 10 years as a law enforcement officer, including seven in the Baltimore Police Department. So I am no stranger to violence.
Indeed, my years surrounded by senseless crime filled me with outrage and the desire for revenge — including the death penalty.

But I have learned a lot since then, including the scary fact that a single mistake could be mean the execution of an innocent person.

As someone who has dedicated my life to enforcing the law, I can't live with that. I testified before the Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment this fall, sharing my journey from death penalty supporter to a supporter of repeal. And last month the Commission validated my experience by voting for the same - the repeal of Maryland's death penalty. It was a smart decision and I hope the legislature will move quickly to enact it.

As I said, my opposition to the death penalty evolved. During my years in Vietnam and later as a military policeman in Louisiana, I was exposed to violence as a matter of routine. My anger at those who would harm innocent people boiled over. Then, working in some of the poorest and crime-ridden neighborhoods of Baltimore only strengthened my feeling that some people were simply beyond redemption. It was a fairly simple conclusion for me to think that the most evil people in our society deserved the death penalty. In my view, those who opposed it were muddleheaded, knee-jerk liberals who were just plain wrong.

I felt that way until about ten years ago. The last decade has seen a broad shift in public opinion on the death penalty, and I was not immune to the new information that was coming out about innocent people being sentenced to death. I was also struck by a talk on the death penalty by then Archbishop of Baltimore, William Cardinal Keeler, when he spoke at a mass at my parish in Towson. I realized then that I had to learn more.

I read about Kirk Noble Bloodsworth — a man sentenced to die in Maryland for a crime he did not commit. I could not begin to imagine the absolute horror of languishing on death row an innocent man. I could not imagine the anticipation of being lifted onto a gurney, strapped down and injected with a combination of lethal drugs by an incompetent nurse's aide — knowing all the time that I had done nothing wrong.

As I read about Mr. Bloodsworth and other innocent people that came close to execution, my doubts about the death penalty grew. Human beings are simply not right 100 percent of the time. No amount of reforms, technological advances, or legal procedures can undo that fact. If the death penalty remains, some state, perhaps even our state, will kill an innocent person. Can we live with that?

Like many people, I have struggled to make sense of this issue. The death penalty seems like a proportionate punishment for a grievous crime. At least it brings justice to victims in the face of evil. But does it? My religion teaches that the path to true peace is through forgiveness. John Paul II traveled to an Italian prison to forgive the man who shot him. The death penalty keeps us from following that noble example. It certainly does not bring back or even honor the dead. It also does not ennoble the living. It does nothing to assuage the sorrow of the victim's loved ones. In fact, as I sat through the commission hearings waiting to testify, I heard from victims' families who said the opposite — that the death penalty's uncertainty only brought them more grief.

The closer you look at it, the less the death penalty makes any sense. As the Maryland commission found, the risk of executing an innocent person is just too high to justify maintaining a punishment that does not deter, costs too much, and harms victims' families.

And as a former police officer, I would add that the death penalty is not needed to protect the public. It is time for Maryland to make the common-sense choice and replace the death penalty with life without parole.

Michael May, of Rodgers Forge, is an attorney and formerly served as a Baltimore City police officer and a military police officer.

Source: Baltimore Examiner

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Greetings from Rome: Bill

Hello,

I am in Rome with the St. Egidio Community for the celebration for the Cities for Life.

Yesterday I spoke at the Law University in Palermo Sicily to about 150 students. There are Journey members speakers spread across Europe at this time. Bud Welch, Marietta Jaeger Lane, Art Laffin, Curtis McCarty, Shujaa Graham, Renny Cushing, George White, Dave Atwood and myself.

The St Egidio Community is a wonderful group of people dedicated to the abolition of the death penalty and other important causes.

Celeste Fitzgerald and Billy Neal Moore also are speaking in Italy. Elizabeth Zitron, from California is also representing the World Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty of which the Journey of Hope is a founding member. There have been numerous interviews with various media sources also. On Saturday evening the was a large conference which concluded with a demonstration at the Roman Coliseum which was lit up in honor of St. Egidio special celebration in which over 900 cities throughout the world lit up special monuments in various cities throughout the world who are calling for world wide abolition of the death penalty...

This is my fifth trip to Italy for this special celebration. A main goal during these days are to gather signatures from students in high schools and colleges throughout Europe.

More later.

Peace,

Bill

(in) ITALY: Former death-row inmates say death penalty immoral, not a deterrent

Curtis E. McCarty says he is not a religious man, but he admires people whose faith leads them to work for the abolition of the death penalty.

William Moore is an ordained Pentecostal minister, who knows that asking for and receiving forgiveness literally is liberating.

The two men, who were in Rome for a Nov. 29 international conference on abolishing the death penalty, are former death-row inmates.

The conference where they spoke was sponsored by the Sant'Egidio Community, a Rome-based lay group that has been actively involved in the campaign to promote a global moratorium on capital executions and the eventual abolition of the death penalty.

Before leaving Rome to continue a speaking tour around Italy, the 2 men spoke Dec. 1 to Catholic News Service. They were joined by David Atwood, the Catholic founder and president of the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty.

McCarty was freed in May 2007 after DNA and other forensic evidence proved he was not guilty of the 1982 murder for which he was convicted and sentenced to die. He had been in prison for almost 22 years -- half his life -- and spent 19 years on death row.

Moore had pleaded guilty to murder and was sentenced to death in 1974. After Moore converted and apologized to the victim's family, the family began lobbying the Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole to commute his sentence to life in prison. And the late Mother Teresa of Calcutta, a death-penalty opponent, spoke to the head of the board. The sentence was commuted in 1990 and he was paroled in 1991.

McCarty said that since February he has been traveling and speaking, "trying to change a few minds."

He believes the death penalty is always wrong.

"It is immoral, first and foremost," he said. "It sounds cliched because you hear it so often, but you don't teach people that killing people is wrong by killing people. It's illogical and it's immoral."

"There is just no justification for taking that man, who is now himself defenseless and caged, helpless, and killing him. It serves no purpose. None," McCarty said.

McCarty said he is proud of the religious people involved in the fight against the death penalty; "they are being true to their faith, not just paying lip service to their faith. I have respect for them, unlike the large portion of the religious community in America that speaks rather loudly about the right to life and the sanctity of life," but supports the execution "of caged men who pose no harm to anybody."

The unjustly convicted McCarty, the forgiven Moore and the activist Atwood know people want to believe the death penalty is a deterrent to crime, but none of them buys it.

"There's not a person alive who does not know what will happen to them if they get caught," McCarty said. "People who commit crimes don't think they are going to get caught. It's a universal mindset."

Moore said, "Getting caught is not part of their plan. Every criminal I've talked to didn't plan to get caught, so the punishment of the death penalty never comes into the equation."

Atwood, who started visiting death-row inmates in the late 1980s and has witnessed three executions, said that after talking to the prisoners, even those who were obviously guilty, "I had no problem seeing that all life is sacred. The sacredness of human life applies to everyone."

Texas has executed 18 prisoners this year and 423 since 1982, he said. "Has it helped anything? Has it made Texas any safer? Not at all."

After 423 executions, he said, "if the death penalty was a deterrent, we would not have any murders in Texas."

Atwood's wife, Priscilla, said, "All life is sacred; all life. That means that it is wrong that people should live in poverty. It is wrong that people should suffer from wars. The death penalty is wrong, just as abortion is. I don't think Jesus ever said, 'This life is more valuable than that life.'"

(source: Catholic News Service)

Only 12 % of Texas law enforcement agencies have reasonable lineup policies

New Study Documents Lack of Lineup Polices in Texas Law Enforcement Agencies

Austin, T.X. (originally released November 18, 2008) - The Justice Project (recently) released a new report documenting that only 12% of Texas law enforcement agencies have any written policies or guidelines for the conduct of photo or live lineup procedures. In addition, the few existing written procedures are often vague and incomplete. Overall, most jurisdictions in Texas fail to implement widely endorsed best practices that have been proven to increase the reliability of eyewitness evidence.

Eighty-two percent of Texas’s 38 wrongful convictions exposed by DNA testing were based largely or exclusively on incorrect eyewitness identifications. Texas currently has no statutory requirements for the conduct of eyewitness identification procedures.

To evaluate Texas law enforcement agencies’ adoption of eyewitness identification best practices, the Justice Project (TJP) requested a copy of all written policies regarding photographic and live lineups from over 1000 law enforcement agencies across the state under the Public Information Act. Scientific research has shown that eyewitness evidence, like trace physical evidence, can be tainted or ruined if not collected carefully according to scientifically informed protocols. Organizations such as The United States Department of Justice, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, and the American Bar Association have recommended best practices for the conduct of eyewitness lineup procedures. TJP evaluated existing policies in four key areas:

* The quality of cautionary instructions provided to the eyewitness;
* Guidelines to ensure fairness in the composition of lineups;
* Blind administration of the lineup by an officer unaware of the identity of the suspect, or equivalent procedure for ensuring neutral lineup administration; and
* Comprehensive documentation of the identification procedure, including witness confidence.

TJP found that only 7% or less of all departments have written policies in each of these areas in line with widely endorsed best practices designed to minimize eyewitness error. The full research report is available
Here

“Photo and live lineups are critical moments in police investigations,” said Edwin Colfax, director of state projects at The Justice Project. “Given the fragile nature of eyewitness evidence and its documented role in wrongful convictions, it is essential that Texas require police to adopt written policies that include key reforms for ensuring the most reliable evidence possible.”

The Justice Project is a non-profit, non-partisan organization that works to improve the fairness and accuracy of the criminal justice system. Last year TJP published “Eyewitness Identification, A Policy Review - TJP is based in Washington, D.C. and opened an office in Austin, Texas in 2006.

Article printed from The Justice Project

Copyright © 2008 thejusticeproject dot org. All rights reserved.